Last month Diane Pretty was refused the legal right to choose the circumstances of her own death. She faces a death that she believes will entail indignity and suffering and physically cannot kill herself. The court has denied her request that her husband be allowed to help her.
A law permitting euthanasia, which was passed by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory of Australia in and which came into force in July last year was overturned last month by a law passed by the Australian Federal Parliament.
In the event it was passed by 38 to 33 votes. The Linacre Centre was gratified to learn that several Senators said they had been influenced to change their minds and oppose the legalization of euthanasia by a talk given in by Luke Gormally at the John Plunkett Centre in Sydney, which the Centre subsequently published and distributed widely.
The article below is an edited version of a Submission made last year by Luke Gormally to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislation Committee, which reported on the issue of legalization prior to the Senate vote. Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: The mere fact that someone says, in an uncoerced fashion, that he or she wants to be killed does not in itself provide a doctor with a reason for thinking death would be a benefit to that patient.
No doctor would accede to an apparently naked request to be killed, however seemingly uncoerced, if he thought the patient had prospects of a worthwhile life. A request to be killed appears to be a ground for euthanasiast killing only if the doctor believes that the patient does not have a worthwhile life.
Now, to say that the ongoing life of a person lacks value amounts to denying value or worth to that person, since the reality of a person is not something distinct from his or her ongoing life. What underpins euthanasiast killing are judgements on the overall worth of certain human lives.
It would be contrary to any legal system which purports to protect and enforce a just social order to legalize killing which rests for its justification on the belief that certain lives lack worth. Because justice in society itself requires a non-arbitrary and non-discriminatory way of identifying who are the subjects of justice.
But the only way of avoiding arbitrariness in identifying the subjects of justice is to assume that all human beings, simply in virtue of being human, are entitled to be treated justly and are the subjects of certain basic human rights.
In other words the basic human dignity and worth which are recognised in respecting human rights must be seen as attaching to our humanity. Basic dignity and worth would not, however, be a title to just treatment if human beings were thought capable of losing them.
They are, so to speak, ineliminable features of our humanity. Euthanasiast killing, even when it is voluntary, involves denial of the ongoing worth of the lives of those reckoned to be candidates for euthanasia. It is a type of killing, therefore, which cannot be accommodated in a legal system for which belief in the worth and dignity of every human being is foundational.
It is of critical importance to every state to maintain a body of laws consistent with respect for the dignity and worth of every human being. In particular, it is important not to legalize killing of the innocent. For it is the fundamental task of civil authority to protect the innocent.
But if the claim that a person lacks a worthwhile life is held to make killing lawful, then the state has ceased to recognise the innocent as having binding claims to protection.Euthanasia, according to the dictionary, means the killing of a person who is suffering from an incurable disease.
Lately, it had been a huge debate over whether euthanasia should be legalized or not. Personally, I believe that euthanasia should be legalized if it is voluntary. I have three reasons. Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Seven Reasons Why They Should Not Be Legalized.
by Luke Gormally  A law permitting euthanasia, which was passed by the Legislative Assembly of the Northern Territory of Australia in (and which came into force in July last year) was overturned last month by a law passed by the Australian .
Top 10 Reasons Euthanasia Should be Illegal In recent decades, there has been much of talk regarding euthanasia, the practice of ending a life in a painless way. One of the greatest controversies surrounding the issue is whether or not it should be legalized.
Euthanasia, according to the dictionary, means the killing of a person who is suffering from an incurable disease. Lately, it had been a huge debate over whether euthanasia should be legalized or not.
Personally, I believe that euthanasia should be legalized if it is voluntary. I have three reasons. Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Seven Reasons Why They Should Not Be Legalized. By Luke Gormally 1. The 'justification' of voluntary euthanasia involves rejection of a tenet fundamental to a just.
Euthanasia Should Not Be Legalized Philosophy Essay. Many people approve such a quiet and easy way of death and argue that euthanasia should be legalized.
But in fact, euthanasia is in conflict with most religions and will bring tremendous negative influences to the whole society. Therefore it should never be legalized. The main reasons can.